Can China escape its confidence doom loop? (Shehzad Qazi)
We’ve got a mega China special today with Shehzad Qazi, from the go-to experts, China Beige Book.
Shehzad filled us in on the misconceptions the market has regarding China’s stimulus, whether the recent run in commodity prices was purely speculative hype, where the property sector goes from here plus where China will find itself by 2050, and lots more.
Sign-up for the Director’s Special
All information in this podcast is for education and entertainment purposes only and is of general nature only.
The hosts of Money of Mine (MoM) are not financial professionals. MoM and our Contributors are not aware of your personal financial circumstances. Before making any investment decision, you should consult a licensed financial, legal or tax professional.
MoM doesn’t operate under an Australian financial services licence and relies on the exemption available under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in respect of any information or advice given. MoM strive to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this podcast but we don’t make any representation or warranty that it’s accurate or up to date. Any views expressed by the hosts of MoM are their opinion only and may contain forward looking statements that may not eventuate.
MoM will not accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or indirect loss arising from any use of information in this podcast.
Thank you to our Partners:
Mineral Mining Services – Your preferred mining contractor
enquiry@mineralms.com.au - 1300 546 117
Grounded - Infrastructure for remote mining and civil projects
Paul Natoli - pn@groundedgroup.com.au
CrossBoundary Energy – Independent power producer
tim.taylor@crossboundary.com - +61 466 184 943
Sandvik Ground Support – The only ground support
https://www.dsiunderground.com/contact
CRE Insurance – Brokers for the Construction, Resources and Energy sectors
davidh@creinsurance.com.au - +61 2 9493 6100
Greenlands Equipment – Turnkey mine water management
Caleb.M@greenlandsequipment.com.au - +61 447 178 806
K-Drill – Safe, reliable, and productive surface RC drilling
drew@k-drill.com.au - +61 416 015 876
MMTS - Mining title consultants for exploration & mining companies
iva.morrell@mmts.net.au
Australian Earthworks and Haulage - Clearing for construction, drilling, dams and rehabilitation works for mining and exploration
Reece Spitalny - +61 434 479 610
We use SPARK - Market data for active ASX Traders - https://sparktrader.com
(0:00:00)Intro
(0:00:00)Misconceptions in China stimulus
(0:05:45)Stockmarket rally
(0:07:42)Good or bad long term?
(0:15:21)Property endgame
(0:20:19)Commodity price lift on stimulus news
(0:23:06)Why didn't stimulus focus on real economy?
(0:27:51)One belt one road
(0:36:36) EV dominance
(0:40:46)Net zero 2060
(0:45:20)Steel exports
(0:46:30)China in 2050?
(0:50:49)Becoming less reliant on the West
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:04,240
Righto Muddy Miners.
Early day for us, Late day for
2
00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:06,760
our guest from Steetser.
To.
3
00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:11,680
York Oh great, we're feeding
this China storage AD like just
4
00:00:11,680 --> 00:00:16,079
like MMS is feeding all the dirt
to provide the steel for any
5
00:00:16,079 --> 00:00:18,160
potential boom in China
stimulus.
6
00:00:18,160 --> 00:00:21,760
So mate, if you want to take
advantage of any any uplift in
7
00:00:21,760 --> 00:00:25,440
the China economy, get MMS to
start moving the dirt for you.
8
00:00:25,440 --> 00:00:29,920
Contract ready, the gears ready,
ready to go to take advantage of
9
00:00:30,080 --> 00:00:31,560
China.
All right, Maddie couldn't.
10
00:00:31,560 --> 00:00:34,880
Have said it better, like with
JD, you've done a bit of
11
00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:36,800
recruitment hustling.
As per usual.
12
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:40,200
We've got Shahzad Kazi from
Stateside.
13
00:00:40,480 --> 00:00:42,080
Mate.
Gobba, thanks for staying.
14
00:00:42,080 --> 00:00:45,200
Uploading having a yawn to us to
today mate.
15
00:00:45,200 --> 00:00:49,120
Welcome to Australia, briefly.
Thank you.
16
00:00:49,120 --> 00:00:52,320
Thanks for having me on.
Maddie, I'm pretty excited to
17
00:00:52,320 --> 00:00:54,160
share this one.
We've, we've got a bit of an
18
00:00:54,240 --> 00:00:57,320
each we need to scratch in this,
this China narrative in recent
19
00:00:57,320 --> 00:01:00,520
times.
And I actually heard a colleague
20
00:01:00,600 --> 00:01:03,480
of Shahzad's Leyland speak on a
podcast a few weeks ago.
21
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:06,080
And I thought their views were
so interesting and a bit
22
00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:07,440
different to what you're hearing
out there.
23
00:01:07,760 --> 00:01:10,760
I thought, why not just get them
on and let's chat about it on
24
00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:12,840
the podcast.
So I think the the best place to
25
00:01:12,840 --> 00:01:15,580
start this one, Shahzad, with
all the news and all the so
26
00:01:15,580 --> 00:01:19,000
called experts about China
flying around in recent weeks, I
27
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:22,280
want to hear from you what the
the biggest misconceptions that
28
00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:25,880
you're seeing out there with
this China stimulus narrative in
29
00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:32,520
the recent two or three weeks?
Well, I think the biggest 1 is
30
00:01:32,520 --> 00:01:37,280
that this was immediately
treated as the Chinese policy
31
00:01:37,280 --> 00:01:42,000
makers are panicking, there's an
economic crisis and they are
32
00:01:42,000 --> 00:01:48,400
stepping in with a big bazooka
stimulus move to solve the
33
00:01:48,400 --> 00:01:51,720
problems in the Chinese economy.
But that's not all.
34
00:01:51,920 --> 00:01:57,240
This is a pull out, the stops do
whatever it takes draggy moment
35
00:01:57,240 --> 00:02:00,240
for China.
I think that was that was the
36
00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:02,640
biggest misconception that we
saw there.
37
00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:08,880
And the problem by the way, is
there is no economic crisis in
38
00:02:08,880 --> 00:02:11,080
China, right.
It's the people who think
39
00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,400
there's a crisis in China who
then tell you, oh, the Communist
40
00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:17,920
Party sees is panicking, there's
a crisis and now they will throw
41
00:02:17,920 --> 00:02:22,280
as much money as they possibly
can or need to, to fix the
42
00:02:22,280 --> 00:02:25,320
problem.
And so that narrative snowballs
43
00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:29,200
into being something bigger and
badder and way more impactful
44
00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:33,560
sounding than so far it seems
any of it will be.
45
00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:36,080
Was there, was there
misconceptions on the scale
46
00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:39,360
when, like when China says
they're going to do something to
47
00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:44,280
people, is there a misconception
about how much they have to do
48
00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:49,200
based on how big China is?
Is that was that taken the wrong
49
00:02:49,200 --> 00:02:51,520
way?
I think there's there's
50
00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:55,000
absolutely a part of it which is
just this obsession over the
51
00:02:55,000 --> 00:02:58,320
overall number, the size of the
package and people are throwing
52
00:02:58,320 --> 00:03:01,720
around, you know, sums in the
various trillions if you want.
53
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:04,720
You know, it's, it's going to be
a 10 trillion this and a six
54
00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:06,520
trillion that and so on and so
forth.
55
00:03:06,920 --> 00:03:10,120
But the other problem is just
kind of saying it's stimulus,
56
00:03:10,120 --> 00:03:14,000
stimulus, stimulus without
specifying what the policy
57
00:03:14,000 --> 00:03:17,800
approach actually is and whether
what's being announced is
58
00:03:17,800 --> 00:03:22,320
actually going to be seen
practically getting rolled out.
59
00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:25,200
And, and also what's being
announced, is it addressing the
60
00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:27,280
challenges at hand.
So let me just get very specific
61
00:03:27,280 --> 00:03:29,120
about that.
A big chunk of what was
62
00:03:29,120 --> 00:03:33,280
discussed upfront was actually
in the area of monetary policy
63
00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:36,680
easing, bringing down the
required reserve ratios and
64
00:03:36,680 --> 00:03:38,640
forcing banks to lend out more
money.
65
00:03:38,920 --> 00:03:43,680
But the fact is China's had like
a lot of monetary policy easing
66
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:47,160
over the last couple of years.
The problem in China isn't that
67
00:03:47,160 --> 00:03:50,400
the cost of capital has been
very high or that it's been
68
00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:52,080
rising.
And, you know, companies are
69
00:03:52,080 --> 00:03:54,480
actually reporting to China
Beige Book year after year for
70
00:03:54,480 --> 00:03:57,880
the last few years that the
overall interest rates that they
71
00:03:57,880 --> 00:03:59,960
have to pay on a particular, on
any loan that they're taking
72
00:03:59,960 --> 00:04:01,640
out, they're actually coming
down.
73
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:04,840
The problem is companies are
just simply not interested in
74
00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:08,280
borrowing and at the levels that
they used to, you know, before
75
00:04:08,280 --> 00:04:10,920
COVID, because they're not
hiring at those levels, They're
76
00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:13,040
not investing at those levels
because the economy is not
77
00:04:13,040 --> 00:04:17,000
running at that pace anymore.
So you could do monetary policy
78
00:04:17,000 --> 00:04:19,839
easing, but that that kind of
stimulus is not going to work
79
00:04:19,839 --> 00:04:23,360
anymore because a problem is not
one that can be solved by
80
00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:26,200
monetary policy.
So that's just a big one, right,
81
00:04:26,200 --> 00:04:29,200
For starters, that markets have
completely misunderstood and I
82
00:04:29,200 --> 00:04:32,160
think missed.
So how does China then break
83
00:04:32,160 --> 00:04:33,480
this?
I think as your colleague kind
84
00:04:33,480 --> 00:04:35,560
of put it, it's a doom
confidence loop.
85
00:04:35,560 --> 00:04:36,640
How?
How do they correct that?
86
00:04:38,040 --> 00:04:40,880
But I think a lot of what they
did was it was exactly getting
87
00:04:40,880 --> 00:04:42,360
at that.
They said, look, equities are
88
00:04:42,360 --> 00:04:44,920
falling.
They're, you know, not a week
89
00:04:44,920 --> 00:04:47,280
goes by when some kind of
investment bank report doesn't
90
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:49,840
come out doing AGDP forecast
downgrade.
91
00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:51,960
There are fears of the skies
falling.
92
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:55,520
And this is a real problem when
it comes to economic commentary
93
00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:57,640
or market commentary on China,
right?
94
00:04:57,640 --> 00:05:01,040
It's it is very bipolar.
Either it's boom times and
95
00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:03,240
everything's going great and
everything's going to soar and
96
00:05:03,240 --> 00:05:06,680
record breaking rallies and, and
high growth levels, or it's a
97
00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:08,800
massive bust.
China's in a crisis.
98
00:05:09,400 --> 00:05:12,120
You know, you've got a Lehman
moment upon us and, and, and the
99
00:05:12,120 --> 00:05:14,520
Sky's falling.
And so this tends to be a real
100
00:05:14,520 --> 00:05:17,440
weakness in the China commentary
world and China watching world
101
00:05:17,440 --> 00:05:19,920
period.
And I think some of it was just
102
00:05:19,920 --> 00:05:23,400
done to say, OK, we need to
provide some kind of floor so
103
00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:26,280
that there's a floor within the
sentiment floor when it comes to
104
00:05:27,120 --> 00:05:30,320
the the market participants, the
investors to a very large
105
00:05:30,320 --> 00:05:32,760
extent, I think domestic
confidence and so forth.
106
00:05:32,760 --> 00:05:34,960
So the idea is to arrest that,
you know, to make sure that you
107
00:05:34,960 --> 00:05:36,760
don't kind of go down that doom
confidence loop.
108
00:05:36,960 --> 00:05:40,360
And if you announce enough, you
know, moves and manoeuvres to
109
00:05:40,360 --> 00:05:43,680
help buttress the economy, you
get some of that, as as we've
110
00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:45,400
seen play out over the last few
weeks now.
111
00:05:45,960 --> 00:05:48,720
So were you surprised that they
one of the mechanisms they did
112
00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:51,640
that through was sort of
buffeting the the stock market?
113
00:05:53,480 --> 00:05:56,440
No, not surprised at all.
I mean look, there has been over
114
00:05:56,440 --> 00:05:59,960
the last several years, you
know, we've seen a few face
115
00:05:59,960 --> 00:06:03,480
ripping rallies now since
especially the lifting of COVID
116
00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:05,800
0.
But really even even this, this
117
00:06:06,520 --> 00:06:12,840
2022 and the rallies have all
resulted in just sell offs one
118
00:06:12,880 --> 00:06:15,520
after the other.
And I think we were in the
119
00:06:15,520 --> 00:06:19,240
middle of another a pretty big
sell off after, after what was
120
00:06:19,240 --> 00:06:21,840
a, a pretty impressive rally at
the beginning of the year when
121
00:06:21,840 --> 00:06:24,680
as you remember, again, the hope
was that China was just going to
122
00:06:24,680 --> 00:06:27,480
take off this year.
And I think the, the, a big, big
123
00:06:27,480 --> 00:06:30,520
chunk of the, the approach was a
significant amount of the
124
00:06:30,520 --> 00:06:34,520
approach was, hey, you know
what, let's create a little bit
125
00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:37,920
of confidence there.
Let's give markets a reason,
126
00:06:37,920 --> 00:06:41,000
rally a little bit and let's
more importantly, we have any
127
00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:44,160
time there is a sell off in
China which is severe and you
128
00:06:44,160 --> 00:06:46,200
started getting into bear market
territory.
129
00:06:46,520 --> 00:06:49,360
One of the things you get is
that the the national team, so
130
00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:51,920
to speak, steps in and starts
buying up stocks, right?
131
00:06:52,080 --> 00:06:54,680
And what they've done this time
around is make this a little bit
132
00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:57,200
more formal in many ways.
They've created that stock
133
00:06:57,200 --> 00:07:00,640
market stabilisation fund, which
actually then relieve some of
134
00:07:00,640 --> 00:07:02,440
the pressure off the national
team because it creates a
135
00:07:02,440 --> 00:07:04,800
mechanism for other
institutional investors and so
136
00:07:04,800 --> 00:07:07,280
forth to get in there.
So, so, So what they're doing is
137
00:07:07,280 --> 00:07:09,600
they're institutionalising a lot
of that sort of approach that
138
00:07:09,600 --> 00:07:12,000
they already have and paper now
that's it.
139
00:07:12,000 --> 00:07:14,800
Let me take a step back and and
point out, I do not for a second
140
00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:19,600
believe that Secretary XI or the
Communist Party are ultimately
141
00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:22,520
staying up at night because the
stock market isn't doing well.
142
00:07:22,720 --> 00:07:25,040
I don't think a lot of their
attention goes towards the stock
143
00:07:25,040 --> 00:07:26,840
market.
I think the vast majority of
144
00:07:26,840 --> 00:07:28,760
their attention really, quite
frankly, now goes towards
145
00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:32,160
national security issues.
But that said, you can't ignore
146
00:07:32,160 --> 00:07:35,280
the stock market altogether.
So, so stabilising the the
147
00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:38,680
sentiment over there and and
helping the market recover a
148
00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:44,920
little was certainly important.
Days this effort, the stimulus
149
00:07:44,960 --> 00:07:47,000
effort.
What what, what do you think
150
00:07:47,000 --> 00:07:49,360
about it?
Is it good or bad long term,
151
00:07:49,480 --> 00:07:52,520
short term, What's the what's
your overall view of it?
152
00:07:52,920 --> 00:07:54,880
Well, stimulus.
Stimulus in general.
153
00:07:56,000 --> 00:07:59,560
Look, there has to be some
amounts of stimulus taking place
154
00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:03,560
within the economy, but it needs
to be very, very targeted and
155
00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:07,200
you know it, it needs to be, I
think much smaller in scope and
156
00:08:07,200 --> 00:08:09,440
scale than investors wanted to
be.
157
00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:12,240
So why do I say this again?
Let's look at the economic
158
00:08:12,240 --> 00:08:15,280
realities of China.
Those years of of high single
159
00:08:15,280 --> 00:08:19,760
digit growth are way, way, way
back in the past, never coming
160
00:08:19,760 --> 00:08:21,720
back.
What you've got ahead is an
161
00:08:21,720 --> 00:08:24,600
economy that can no longer
function on the old premise of
162
00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:27,240
we're going to invest a bunch of
money, we're going to build a
163
00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:29,480
bunch of infrastructure and it's
going to result in a in high
164
00:08:29,480 --> 00:08:32,080
levels of growth.
The road has completely run out
165
00:08:32,080 --> 00:08:34,760
on that thing.
The future now is something that
166
00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:38,799
is much slower pace and in an
ideal world more sustainable
167
00:08:38,880 --> 00:08:43,000
because it is driven by strong
household spending and strong
168
00:08:43,159 --> 00:08:47,080
consumption parts of the
economy, not the high investment
169
00:08:47,080 --> 00:08:50,480
or or the traditional industrial
parts of the economy.
170
00:08:51,080 --> 00:08:54,320
So now we have to focus on what
is it going to take to help
171
00:08:54,320 --> 00:08:56,880
transition the economy.
That's where you get into the
172
00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,160
stimulus side.
So could monetary policy be
173
00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:01,240
helpful?
Yes, it can, but not the way
174
00:09:01,240 --> 00:09:03,680
they're doing it today.
Monetary policy can be helpful
175
00:09:03,680 --> 00:09:07,240
if you actually create specific
types of loans or lending
176
00:09:07,240 --> 00:09:10,880
facilities that are targeted
exclusively towards private
177
00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:14,560
enterprises, towards SM ES.
These are parts of the economy
178
00:09:14,560 --> 00:09:16,680
that the Chinese policy makers
have been telling us that
179
00:09:16,680 --> 00:09:19,800
they're trying to help for years
and years and years, but in
180
00:09:19,800 --> 00:09:21,600
practise, in reality just
doesn't happen.
181
00:09:22,000 --> 00:09:26,080
Our proprietary tracking for
example, of credit access, one
182
00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:29,120
of the things that we see
repeatedly is that SM ES borrow
183
00:09:29,120 --> 00:09:33,320
at far higher costs at a far
higher cost than large firms do
184
00:09:33,520 --> 00:09:35,880
and their borrowing levels
typically tend to be far lower
185
00:09:35,880 --> 00:09:38,440
as a result of that than
compared to large enterprises.
186
00:09:38,640 --> 00:09:41,160
Money is simply not going
towards the parts of the economy
187
00:09:41,320 --> 00:09:44,560
that would actually be driving
China forward from from the
188
00:09:44,560 --> 00:09:47,120
standpoint of hiring a lot of
young folks, right?
189
00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:48,760
Youth unemployment is a big
problem, right?
190
00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:51,840
So and, and be putting money
back in the pockets of Chinese
191
00:09:51,840 --> 00:09:54,560
households that can go out there
and spend and help lift overall
192
00:09:54,560 --> 00:09:56,920
consumer spent sentiment and
then, you know, consumer
193
00:09:56,920 --> 00:09:59,120
spending.
So those sorts of that, that's
194
00:09:59,120 --> 00:10:02,040
an area where you could have
stimulus as I've laid out, but
195
00:10:02,040 --> 00:10:03,840
we're not really seeing anything
of that sort.
196
00:10:04,080 --> 00:10:08,760
The property market overall, you
know, they, they really strangle
197
00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:10,880
that they, they tighten the
noose around the neck of the
198
00:10:10,880 --> 00:10:14,360
property market pretty severely.
Letting some of that go now
199
00:10:14,640 --> 00:10:18,200
makes sense has to be very slow
and very measured.
200
00:10:18,200 --> 00:10:21,840
You cannot get into the problem
off again reflating the bubble.
201
00:10:22,040 --> 00:10:24,720
So, so you know there is good
stimulus that can be done in
202
00:10:24,720 --> 00:10:26,080
China.
It just, we're going to have to
203
00:10:26,080 --> 00:10:28,640
wait and see how how much of it
is actually coming through.
204
00:10:29,080 --> 00:10:33,200
Wait, so when even when like JD
over here is old and grey in the
205
00:10:33,200 --> 00:10:36,360
dead the many, many decades to
come, as you said, they've gone
206
00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:40,200
from this huge growth now to
like it's more of a slower burn.
207
00:10:40,400 --> 00:10:45,080
Like will China eventually get
to the point look of a Japan
208
00:10:45,080 --> 00:10:48,440
where the the economy will start
deflating?
209
00:10:48,440 --> 00:10:52,200
And if if so, in the future
future, what like effect is that
210
00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:54,440
going to have on the rest rest
of the world?
211
00:10:55,880 --> 00:10:57,240
Yeah.
So look, I mean, if you if you
212
00:10:57,240 --> 00:11:00,840
get a Chinese economy that can
grow, that can manage to grow
213
00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:04,840
more than a percent, 2% at best,
and then you get some years
214
00:11:04,840 --> 00:11:06,520
where it's just seeing no growth
at all.
215
00:11:06,520 --> 00:11:10,040
Or are you getting these patches
of stagnation that is naturally
216
00:11:10,320 --> 00:11:13,400
a bad news for at least parts of
the world, right, That that's
217
00:11:13,400 --> 00:11:17,440
bad news for commodities
producers, predominantly for
218
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:22,680
selling China copper and steel
and oil and so forth.
219
00:11:22,680 --> 00:11:27,440
That's pretty bad news for you.
On the other hand, it can also
220
00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:29,760
be bad news for you if you're a
China, if you're trading
221
00:11:29,760 --> 00:11:33,400
partners of China and, and we're
in a position similar to today's
222
00:11:33,400 --> 00:11:36,560
where the government realises,
OK, property is a very small
223
00:11:36,560 --> 00:11:39,760
part of the overall economy.
We want it to be that way and
224
00:11:39,760 --> 00:11:42,960
and that that's where it is.
We haven't been very successful
225
00:11:42,960 --> 00:11:45,000
at getting Chinese consumers
revved up.
226
00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:48,760
So consumer spending really
isn't driving much of economic
227
00:11:48,760 --> 00:11:51,320
growth.
Well, looks like we're kind of
228
00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:55,320
stuck with helping having
manufacturing just be that
229
00:11:55,320 --> 00:11:57,120
economic driver.
And yes, it's not the
230
00:11:57,120 --> 00:12:00,880
manufacturing of off to the
2000s of the 2000 and 10s, but
231
00:12:00,880 --> 00:12:03,680
it's still something.
So you know, what you do is you
232
00:12:03,680 --> 00:12:05,760
continue pumping money into that
sector.
233
00:12:06,000 --> 00:12:09,560
And to the extent you possibly
can, you continue flooding the
234
00:12:09,560 --> 00:12:13,240
world with cheap products.
You bring prices down
235
00:12:13,240 --> 00:12:15,240
artificially, you keep subsidies
high.
236
00:12:15,560 --> 00:12:18,280
But that's really bad news for
the economy, for the other side,
237
00:12:18,440 --> 00:12:19,880
right?
Because then you're talking
238
00:12:19,880 --> 00:12:24,280
about that continuation of the
overcapacity problem in China,
239
00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:28,720
which is a big, big, big policy,
a concern and and a legitimate
240
00:12:28,720 --> 00:12:31,280
problem that that we're facing
now.
241
00:12:31,280 --> 00:12:33,720
I mean, what has China done
since the outset of COVID?
242
00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:35,520
I mean, it's been a
manufacturing driven recovery
243
00:12:35,520 --> 00:12:37,240
there.
And over the last couple of
244
00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:40,680
years especially countries
around the world have realised,
245
00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:43,880
man, there's a lot of Chinese
steel coming into our into our
246
00:12:43,880 --> 00:12:45,680
borders.
There's a lot of Chinese copper
247
00:12:45,680 --> 00:12:47,840
coming now into our borders.
There are a lot of cheap Chinese
248
00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:51,320
cars that have absolutely
decimated the the car industry
249
00:12:51,320 --> 00:12:53,600
and the, and the automotive
industry around the world in
250
00:12:53,600 --> 00:12:55,600
different countries.
Europe, of course, overwhelmed
251
00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:58,800
with Chinese EVs.
So, so you could have that.
252
00:12:58,800 --> 00:13:02,880
So in any event, a China that is
not a vibrant economy, even
253
00:13:02,880 --> 00:13:06,840
though it is growing at A at a
slower pace, a China that is not
254
00:13:06,840 --> 00:13:11,160
economically successful is bad
news for multiple reasons.
255
00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:15,080
Do you do you think that's going
to really drive the ex China
256
00:13:15,080 --> 00:13:18,000
thing around the world if that
is the case?
257
00:13:19,720 --> 00:13:23,400
Like debottlenecking everyone
from China.
258
00:13:25,160 --> 00:13:28,400
So do you, when you say that, do
you mean getting getting China
259
00:13:28,400 --> 00:13:29,560
out of supply chains?
Do you?
260
00:13:29,560 --> 00:13:32,120
Or do you mean getting China out
of stock indices?
261
00:13:32,120 --> 00:13:33,560
Which what?
What specifically are you?
262
00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:39,240
Thinking supply chain mostly.
Yeah, I think there is a policy,
263
00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:42,760
there's absolutely a policy push
now certain within the United
264
00:13:42,760 --> 00:13:45,840
States, we're getting some of
this in Europe now, the whole
265
00:13:45,840 --> 00:13:50,080
concept of China plus one, China
plus whatever.
266
00:13:50,560 --> 00:13:53,440
And that's most likely the
trajectory of, of, of where
267
00:13:53,440 --> 00:13:57,160
things are headed, but it's,
there's no telling how quickly
268
00:13:57,160 --> 00:14:00,520
that's going to be accomplished
and how deep it's going to be
269
00:14:00,520 --> 00:14:03,400
and how wide it's going to be.
So how many industries
270
00:14:03,400 --> 00:14:06,240
ultimately are going to be
forced to say we need China plus
271
00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:08,160
one?
A lot of industries in the, in
272
00:14:08,160 --> 00:14:10,400
the many and a lot of
manufacturing, broadly speaking,
273
00:14:10,400 --> 00:14:13,160
of course, realise that during
COVID, when their factories kept
274
00:14:13,160 --> 00:14:16,040
getting shut down over and over
again and they couldn't produce
275
00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:18,760
things to service their clients
back in their home markets or
276
00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:20,960
even if they were foreign
companies, Vietnamese or so
277
00:14:20,960 --> 00:14:24,000
forth that were selling abroad,
right, or selling elsewhere in
278
00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:25,680
Asia.
OK, so that so that was a lesson
279
00:14:25,680 --> 00:14:27,880
you took away.
But COVID was was potentially a
280
00:14:27,880 --> 00:14:29,640
once in a lifetime thing.
Maybe it doesn't come back.
281
00:14:29,640 --> 00:14:32,800
So you that that risk comes down
in your calculations.
282
00:14:33,880 --> 00:14:36,120
Well, certain critical
industries, maybe the medical
283
00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:39,280
industries, the pharmaceutical
industries and and so forth.
284
00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:43,960
Maybe they realise that you do
need to have a China plus one.
285
00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:47,400
But where you go, where is the
capacity elsewhere in Asia that
286
00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:51,840
can actually be a legitimate
transplant or, or, or
287
00:14:51,840 --> 00:14:54,400
alternative, I should say, to
producing in China.
288
00:14:54,560 --> 00:14:56,160
So I think we're seeing this
unfold.
289
00:14:56,160 --> 00:14:59,080
I do think that ultimately
policy makers, especially out in
290
00:14:59,080 --> 00:15:02,040
the West are going to start
applying more and more pressure.
291
00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:05,760
It's just going to take a while
to build up the political, I
292
00:15:05,760 --> 00:15:10,800
think, I think desire is, is the
political will is, is there, is
293
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,640
there.
I say it cautiously, but you
294
00:15:13,640 --> 00:15:17,720
know, I think, I think
politicians need crises to do
295
00:15:17,720 --> 00:15:20,000
the right thing sometimes and
it's taking them a while to get
296
00:15:20,000 --> 00:15:21,400
to get their act together, I
think.
297
00:15:21,880 --> 00:15:24,440
Shazad, you, you mentioned the,
the property sector earlier
298
00:15:24,440 --> 00:15:26,640
there and I think the, the
number that's commonly thrown
299
00:15:26,640 --> 00:15:29,800
around that it makes up sort of
25% of the economy and China
300
00:15:29,800 --> 00:15:34,920
very much has the the interest
to pull that into kind of size.
301
00:15:34,920 --> 00:15:36,240
What do you think the the end
game is?
302
00:15:36,240 --> 00:15:39,160
What do you think the natural
size for the property sector as
303
00:15:39,160 --> 00:15:40,760
a part of the broader economy
is?
304
00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:44,440
Yeah, that's a question.
Well, look, it's all, it's all
305
00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:47,200
TBD.
And and you know, we, we, we
306
00:15:47,200 --> 00:15:50,320
really will not be able to
figure this out for I think
307
00:15:50,320 --> 00:15:52,880
several years ahead.
And I'll tell you why this is so
308
00:15:52,880 --> 00:15:56,360
complicated.
We're in a period right now
309
00:15:56,360 --> 00:16:00,240
where the property market has
been basically in a free fall.
310
00:16:00,800 --> 00:16:04,600
The housing market is, is, is at
the lowest levels that we've
311
00:16:04,600 --> 00:16:07,160
seen it at.
And the commercial real estate
312
00:16:07,160 --> 00:16:10,480
side of the, of the property
market is also, by the way, and
313
00:16:10,480 --> 00:16:13,640
a lot more pain than is
understood or or acknowledged.
314
00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:18,680
You could get a property market
bailout as we're seeing happen
315
00:16:18,680 --> 00:16:22,600
right now that stabilises the
property market, I think or
316
00:16:22,600 --> 00:16:24,720
helps the market find a bottom
in the bigger cities.
317
00:16:25,040 --> 00:16:27,080
But I think this, this is this
is sort of a cyclical thing.
318
00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:29,720
Maybe you get a couple of good
years and then again, you start
319
00:16:29,720 --> 00:16:32,720
getting some amounts of property
paid cyclically in the bigger
320
00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:34,320
cities.
Those are the bigger cities.
321
00:16:34,640 --> 00:16:35,840
That's what everybody focuses
on.
322
00:16:36,040 --> 00:16:38,480
And I think if you get a
cyclical bottom in places like
323
00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:41,720
Shanghai or Beijing and all
that, most of your markets
324
00:16:41,800 --> 00:16:45,240
market participants and Western
observers and bankers and, and I
325
00:16:45,240 --> 00:16:47,360
bank and our investment bankers,
I should say analyst, they'll,
326
00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:49,640
they'll be pretty happy.
But there's a whole bunch of
327
00:16:49,640 --> 00:16:52,480
pain in the property market that
is going to go, I think,
328
00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:57,920
unacknowledged and, and unsolved
or unresolved in the lower tier
329
00:16:57,920 --> 00:17:01,200
cities where, by the way, the
bulk of the, of the, of the
330
00:17:01,440 --> 00:17:05,520
overbuilding took place.
So if you think about, you know,
331
00:17:05,520 --> 00:17:08,079
including that in the accounting
of, of National Statistics,
332
00:17:08,440 --> 00:17:10,640
well, that's going to be a big
problem year after year after
333
00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:12,960
year where those apartments are
just sitting empty and nobody
334
00:17:12,960 --> 00:17:16,280
wants to buy them and, and
people who did own them are not
335
00:17:16,280 --> 00:17:19,319
able to get rid of them.
And so that's just a dead weight
336
00:17:19,599 --> 00:17:21,800
that you're carrying.
So I think it's not clear
337
00:17:21,800 --> 00:17:25,240
whether this ends up being 5% of
the of the GDP, whether it ends
338
00:17:25,240 --> 00:17:27,520
up being a little bit more, ends
up being a little bit less.
339
00:17:28,000 --> 00:17:29,880
But we know it's going to be a
sliver and we know that it's
340
00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:33,400
going to be a pain point for for
a while to come.
341
00:17:33,520 --> 00:17:36,960
Even if in the short run we
start to get some amount of
342
00:17:37,360 --> 00:17:41,160
this, this idea that OK, finally
there's a bottom, things are
343
00:17:41,160 --> 00:17:45,160
stabilising, maybe there's a
chance prices start to go up a
344
00:17:45,160 --> 00:17:48,000
little bit, people have come
start coming in for the sideline
345
00:17:48,280 --> 00:17:49,920
and buying up apartments and
stuff again.
346
00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:52,600
Well, people are coming off the
sidelines, boys.
347
00:17:52,600 --> 00:17:55,000
For K Drew, that's always coming
off the sidelines.
348
00:17:55,000 --> 00:18:00,680
They are staking their claim as
we speak in WA exploration.
349
00:18:00,960 --> 00:18:02,840
Good to see more companies using
their names.
350
00:18:03,000 --> 00:18:05,840
K Drew in the announcements.
There is, we've got one right
351
00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:09,720
here.
Bloody look at smashing out some
352
00:18:09,720 --> 00:18:14,160
RC holes at the gold worthy ace
project for macro metals like
353
00:18:14,200 --> 00:18:18,200
just highlighted their K drill
make free advertisement for ASX
354
00:18:18,200 --> 00:18:20,440
companies.
You engage K drill to do the
355
00:18:20,440 --> 00:18:22,680
contract for you.
You get a screenshot that is
356
00:18:22,680 --> 00:18:26,080
like bloody the deal of a
lifetime and I've got a bit of
357
00:18:26,080 --> 00:18:27,480
word on the.
Duke They knew it because they
358
00:18:27,640 --> 00:18:29,840
they put in two photos of the K
drill in the captions as well.
359
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:32,720
Bloody easy, easy.
And they get to meet Ron
360
00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:33,800
O'Sullivan.
Mate.
361
00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:37,360
And bit of word on the decline
about Ron O'Sullivan as we know
362
00:18:37,360 --> 00:18:41,760
like because like it's old news
that he painted, patented the
363
00:18:42,360 --> 00:18:45,280
bare hand drilling technique,
but made him here and he's
364
00:18:45,280 --> 00:18:48,920
actually training up Drew Harvey
on the technique so they can
365
00:18:48,920 --> 00:18:51,640
cover both day and night shift.
What's the technique?
366
00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:56,000
I don't know it's I'm not
willing to go there due to legal
367
00:18:56,000 --> 00:18:57,360
battles.
I don't know how they're going
368
00:18:57,360 --> 00:18:59,280
to do that.
And the BD at the pubs.
369
00:18:59,280 --> 00:19:01,560
The pub.
If any team can, it's the K
370
00:19:01,560 --> 00:19:03,000
drill.
If you want a bare hand drilling
371
00:19:03,000 --> 00:19:06,000
demo from the great Ron
O'Sullivan and his protege Drew
372
00:19:06,000 --> 00:19:09,320
Harvey, give K Drill a buzz and
holy snap and duck shit.
373
00:19:09,320 --> 00:19:12,240
They can punch into Marcy and
diamond holes for you as well.
374
00:19:12,480 --> 00:19:13,520
OK, drill.
OK.
375
00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:17,440
Drill go Australia.
So do you think we then see a
376
00:19:17,440 --> 00:19:19,080
couple of these property
developers?
377
00:19:19,080 --> 00:19:22,400
I mean, we've seen some big
names in recent years, but do we
378
00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:26,320
continue to see them go to the
wall in in the next 5-10 years?
379
00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:30,480
I think, I think I think there's
more pain ahead and some of
380
00:19:30,480 --> 00:19:33,520
those, you know, smaller
developers, you know, we, we
381
00:19:33,520 --> 00:19:36,200
might start hearing off of
developers that are second or
382
00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:37,640
third tier also that are in
trouble.
383
00:19:37,640 --> 00:19:40,840
The the size of the overall
balance sheets are naturally not
384
00:19:40,840 --> 00:19:43,200
going to be what the big ones
were with like the average of
385
00:19:43,200 --> 00:19:45,680
the world were like.
But I think the idea that
386
00:19:45,680 --> 00:19:49,160
somehow developers are now going
to slowly be able to get out of
387
00:19:49,160 --> 00:19:50,560
trouble.
I don't think so.
388
00:19:50,560 --> 00:19:52,640
I think they're, they're going
to be lots of developers,
389
00:19:52,640 --> 00:19:55,600
including the big ones still
sitting, you know, with a lot of
390
00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:59,800
debt that they are unable to
repay or repay in any time, any
391
00:19:59,800 --> 00:20:02,800
anytime soon.
So I think there is still still
392
00:20:02,800 --> 00:20:07,120
bad news ahead if if you're a
bond holder of a Shimao or, or,
393
00:20:07,120 --> 00:20:08,760
or a country garden or whatever
else.
394
00:20:09,840 --> 00:20:13,880
And so or or some other Chinese
developers, I think there's
395
00:20:13,880 --> 00:20:19,000
probably still some more pain to
be felt down down the road.
396
00:20:19,520 --> 00:20:22,120
And on the commodities you
mentioned earlier, you mentioned
397
00:20:22,200 --> 00:20:26,480
copper, steel, iron or I found
it pretty surprising, we were
398
00:20:26,480 --> 00:20:29,160
speaking about this a couple
weeks ago to see them all RIP a
399
00:20:29,160 --> 00:20:33,320
bit higher on the back of all
the stimulus given the the by
400
00:20:33,320 --> 00:20:36,240
and large sort of monit monetary
nature of a lot of the, the
401
00:20:36,240 --> 00:20:39,840
stimulus, not too much big
infrastructure plans or anything
402
00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:41,920
like that.
So I want to hear it from an
403
00:20:41,920 --> 00:20:43,560
expert.
Did did it surprise you to see
404
00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:47,600
iron ore jump as as high as it
did and and steel and and copper
405
00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:49,800
and other sort of base and
industry metals?
406
00:20:51,560 --> 00:20:54,280
This was all speculation.
I mean we certainly got a big,
407
00:20:54,760 --> 00:20:56,360
you know, rally in the equity
side.
408
00:20:56,360 --> 00:20:58,560
A lot of it was I would say
significant amount of
409
00:20:58,560 --> 00:21:00,680
speculation there.
But I think the commodity stuff
410
00:21:00,680 --> 00:21:05,160
is largely speculation because
let's think about this.
411
00:21:05,280 --> 00:21:08,080
Has has there been any
announcement on the fiscal
412
00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:13,840
stimulus side to date that says
we're going to do more building
413
00:21:14,560 --> 00:21:18,080
court renovations, renovations
of other infrastructure, perhaps
414
00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:20,520
construction of new
infrastructure or upgrading of
415
00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:22,680
new infrastructure That would
help us say, OK, there's going
416
00:21:22,680 --> 00:21:24,840
to be more steel that's going to
go in or more copper.
417
00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:27,320
Copper is going to get used.
OK, That's a bullish sign.
418
00:21:27,560 --> 00:21:28,920
There hasn't been, I haven't
heard anything.
419
00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:31,520
Property market.
Let's look at the property
420
00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:32,920
market.
You know what what they're
421
00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,120
saying they're trying to sell.
There are already two things,
422
00:21:35,120 --> 00:21:36,680
right?
They're trying to, first of all,
423
00:21:37,040 --> 00:21:40,360
apartments that are, that have
been paid for but not yet built,
424
00:21:40,520 --> 00:21:43,240
they want to get them finished
and so that people have access
425
00:21:43,240 --> 00:21:45,000
to them.
Is that somewhat bullish for
426
00:21:45,000 --> 00:21:45,920
commodities?
Maybe.
427
00:21:45,920 --> 00:21:48,520
But unfinished apartments can be
a different phases of the
428
00:21:48,520 --> 00:21:50,240
finishing cycle, right?
Doesn't necessarily mean they're
429
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:53,640
completely unbuilt, but the
other thing that they've
430
00:21:53,640 --> 00:21:56,800
announced is no new
construction, or at least they
431
00:21:56,800 --> 00:21:58,560
said they were.
They're going to like to see no
432
00:21:58,560 --> 00:22:01,440
new construction because they
don't want to have more property
433
00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:04,160
coming online when there's a
whole bunch of existing property
434
00:22:04,160 --> 00:22:06,640
that they're having that that
that companies are having a
435
00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:08,600
difficult time offloading and
selling.
436
00:22:08,600 --> 00:22:10,720
And there's already that
inventory of unsold property
437
00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:14,600
that has been building higher.
That part of the policy plan, by
438
00:22:14,600 --> 00:22:17,400
the way, is awful for
commodities because that means a
439
00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:20,520
construction activity, which is
already been quite low by
440
00:22:20,520 --> 00:22:23,880
historic standards, can only get
further depressed if they
441
00:22:23,880 --> 00:22:25,960
actually push the GO button on
that.
442
00:22:26,240 --> 00:22:29,160
So that's net, net actually
pretty bad, I think, for
443
00:22:29,160 --> 00:22:31,840
commodities.
So this is, you know, so that
444
00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:34,520
right there tells you that a lot
of it is speculative fervour.
445
00:22:34,760 --> 00:22:37,440
And then #3 the big picture
thing we keep coming back to
446
00:22:37,680 --> 00:22:41,240
what part of the stimulus plans
announced so far are actually
447
00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:44,680
stimulus, actually stimulus
measures that are going to
448
00:22:44,680 --> 00:22:49,400
impact the real economy.
Very, very few if at all as
449
00:22:49,400 --> 00:22:53,280
we've laid out, you know, so, so
unless the the impact of the
450
00:22:53,280 --> 00:22:57,680
real economy is clear, there
shouldn't really be a fund a
451
00:22:57,680 --> 00:23:00,760
reason for based on fundamentals
for for commodities to be
452
00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:03,120
rallying.
So I think a lot of it we can
453
00:23:03,120 --> 00:23:05,400
probably summarise is it's
positive vibes.
454
00:23:07,240 --> 00:23:09,560
Why didn't the stimulus focus on
the real economy?
455
00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:15,640
Is it just sentiment and seeing
housing prices in seeing you
456
00:23:15,640 --> 00:23:18,200
know, your, your, your shares
that you have in your portfolio
457
00:23:18,200 --> 00:23:20,600
go up to to kick up the the
sentiment?
458
00:23:20,600 --> 00:23:22,920
Is that why they targeted in the
way they did?
459
00:23:24,320 --> 00:23:27,000
I think the biggest way to
target the real economy is
460
00:23:27,000 --> 00:23:29,400
through a combination of
packages that are multiple, that
461
00:23:29,400 --> 00:23:32,280
are multi phase.
So multi year packages that get
462
00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:36,520
at the that get at the short
term sort of maybe you know, you
463
00:23:36,520 --> 00:23:40,720
well, you could right now call
cyclical problems such as, you
464
00:23:40,720 --> 00:23:43,800
know, a soft consumer spending,
but really, you know, it's part
465
00:23:43,800 --> 00:23:47,320
of a larger structural problem.
But really that get it, get it
466
00:23:47,560 --> 00:23:49,920
correcting some of the
structural problems within the
467
00:23:49,920 --> 00:23:52,680
economy.
So short term boost when it
468
00:23:52,680 --> 00:23:55,760
comes to affecting the real
economy would be giving
469
00:23:55,760 --> 00:24:00,120
households money to spend,
giving them whether it's cash
470
00:24:00,120 --> 00:24:03,080
vouchers, whether it's other
forms of stimulus cheques.
471
00:24:03,080 --> 00:24:05,480
It doesn't have to look like
what happened out in Europe and
472
00:24:05,480 --> 00:24:07,120
the United States in the
aftermath of COVID.
473
00:24:07,120 --> 00:24:08,960
It's not, it's not the same kind
of economy.
474
00:24:09,120 --> 00:24:11,240
It's not the same kind of
advanced consumer economy.
475
00:24:11,320 --> 00:24:14,680
It's a, you know, it can have
absolutely be done with Chinese
476
00:24:14,680 --> 00:24:17,640
characteristics, if you will,
but but some amounts of money
477
00:24:17,640 --> 00:24:20,120
that is going into the pockets
of Chinese households that
478
00:24:20,120 --> 00:24:22,400
encourages them to go out there
and spend.
479
00:24:23,400 --> 00:24:25,560
But we didn't really see that
what we got over trade in
480
00:24:25,560 --> 00:24:27,320
programmes.
OK, trade in programmes are
481
00:24:27,320 --> 00:24:30,640
great, but trade in programmes
have a, you know, a much lower
482
00:24:30,640 --> 00:24:34,000
ceiling, you know, so you could
exchange your refrigerator out
483
00:24:34,000 --> 00:24:37,800
for perhaps a, a newer one or a
slightly less old one.
484
00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:39,320
And you can do those sorts of
things.
485
00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:43,520
You're, you're pulling growth
forward and and that's fine.
486
00:24:43,760 --> 00:24:46,600
But you know that that's, that
means you're, that's growth.
487
00:24:46,600 --> 00:24:49,400
You're not going to get six
months out or, or, or, or even
488
00:24:49,400 --> 00:24:52,880
potentially even next quarter.
And it's not any kind, it's not
489
00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:54,760
a sustained thing.
You know, how many times can you
490
00:24:54,760 --> 00:24:59,160
swap out a, a old computer or,
or, or or so forth.
491
00:25:00,760 --> 00:25:02,760
So, so the stimulus measures
still have to be when it comes
492
00:25:02,760 --> 00:25:04,400
to the household side, they have
to be a little bit bigger.
493
00:25:04,400 --> 00:25:07,520
They have to be a little bit
more sustained in nature.
494
00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:10,200
That would be the most direct
way to immediately boost the
495
00:25:10,200 --> 00:25:13,920
Chinese to boost the, you know,
the, the economy over the next
496
00:25:13,920 --> 00:25:16,880
several quarters going through
at least through, through
497
00:25:16,960 --> 00:25:18,840
through next year.
But they haven't done it.
498
00:25:18,840 --> 00:25:21,160
If you like to talk about the
bigger structural things, I've
499
00:25:21,160 --> 00:25:25,720
already talked about doing
monetary policy stimulus focused
500
00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:28,160
on the, on the SM, ES and the
economy and the new economy
501
00:25:28,440 --> 00:25:30,160
industries and the private
market.
502
00:25:30,920 --> 00:25:33,480
Start addressing other
structural factors like what is
503
00:25:33,480 --> 00:25:35,920
going on with elder care in that
country, right?
504
00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:38,800
It's a grain population, it's an
older population, that
505
00:25:38,800 --> 00:25:41,640
demographic decline that we
talked about announcing very
506
00:25:41,640 --> 00:25:44,200
serious amounts of social
spending as in regards to Social
507
00:25:44,200 --> 00:25:47,920
Security, healthcare spending
and and everything else that you
508
00:25:47,920 --> 00:25:50,400
would need in front of terms of
having a social infrastructure
509
00:25:50,400 --> 00:25:53,920
and a policy infrastructure to
support your elderly population.
510
00:25:54,440 --> 00:25:57,160
And therefore also take pressure
off young people who are often
511
00:25:57,160 --> 00:25:59,440
times making a salary and having
to support parents and
512
00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:02,600
grandparents #3 And I'll pause
there.
513
00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:05,680
You want to have, you want
people to have kids, right?
514
00:26:05,680 --> 00:26:09,640
Two kids or three kids now?
Well, provide the type of
515
00:26:10,320 --> 00:26:13,160
childcare support that that they
would need to do that.
516
00:26:13,160 --> 00:26:15,960
So this is where I'm talking
about a much more involved in a
517
00:26:15,960 --> 00:26:17,800
bigger welfare state, if you
will.
518
00:26:18,080 --> 00:26:21,240
And social services spending on
a Chinese state today has
519
00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:23,960
implant.
That's now that's stimulus, but
520
00:26:23,960 --> 00:26:26,760
that's really going on and
trying to get into the
521
00:26:26,800 --> 00:26:29,920
structural side of the economy.
I even touched other things like
522
00:26:29,920 --> 00:26:32,400
the, you know, more
privatisation and the transfer
523
00:26:32,400 --> 00:26:35,280
of state assets into private
hands and all those other kinds
524
00:26:35,280 --> 00:26:38,200
of things that could be done,
which would, you know, would be
525
00:26:38,200 --> 00:26:41,200
stimulative in nature, but
really are more structural
526
00:26:41,200 --> 00:26:45,200
changes to the economy than just
announcing, you know, the stock
527
00:26:45,200 --> 00:26:46,600
market stabilisation.
Fund.
528
00:26:46,800 --> 00:26:49,440
You know my peak stimulation
occurs when I see some
529
00:26:49,440 --> 00:26:53,960
Greenland's equipment people on
site sorting mining companies
530
00:26:53,960 --> 00:26:57,040
out for any water related stuff.
Oh look at this.
531
00:26:57,040 --> 00:27:01,640
Look what I've found.
This Greenland's expert checking
532
00:27:01,640 --> 00:27:04,760
shit with a notepad.
You know what a notepad means
533
00:27:04,760 --> 00:27:06,640
boys?
Attention to detail.
534
00:27:07,040 --> 00:27:09,000
Have a look have a look at that
mate.
535
00:27:09,000 --> 00:27:11,720
Look at this pond and pump setup
right.
536
00:27:11,760 --> 00:27:15,840
I look at it and I think holy
shit that looks complex and but
537
00:27:15,840 --> 00:27:17,960
No Fear.
No Fear money miners.
538
00:27:18,280 --> 00:27:20,760
That's why Greenland's run the
water guy.
539
00:27:21,320 --> 00:27:24,920
But complex water projects for
them are like me making school
540
00:27:24,920 --> 00:27:26,880
lunches for the kids fucking
easy.
541
00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:29,960
Like just place a piss.
Do it every morning.
542
00:27:29,960 --> 00:27:31,760
So, but it's like a Lego
project.
543
00:27:31,800 --> 00:27:35,320
Yeah, but no, no Lego heaps out.
Yeah, you right.
544
00:27:35,320 --> 00:27:36,840
You won't do your ZAP kids.
You still play.
545
00:27:37,360 --> 00:27:42,080
I'll do the kid jokes.
Oh, but you want any water job
546
00:27:42,280 --> 00:27:45,920
job done on site?
Greenland needs to be on your
547
00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:47,400
site.
The go to name.
548
00:27:47,680 --> 00:27:50,760
God, give Caleb a buzz.
Go Greenland.
549
00:27:52,280 --> 00:27:55,000
So I want to go deeper on the,
on the commodity and the
550
00:27:55,000 --> 00:27:58,360
industrial part of the economy.
Shazad, one of one of the big
551
00:27:58,360 --> 00:28:02,440
trends we've seen over the past
10-15 years was the one belt,
552
00:28:02,440 --> 00:28:06,960
one Rd initiative.
China going overseas at one of
553
00:28:06,960 --> 00:28:11,200
the areas that we saw quite
acutely was in Africa, China
554
00:28:11,200 --> 00:28:15,240
just gobbling up assets and also
just helping build ports and and
555
00:28:15,240 --> 00:28:17,840
these sorts of things.
Do you think that's something
556
00:28:17,840 --> 00:28:23,800
that slows in the next decade?
It seems like a lot of the one
557
00:28:23,800 --> 00:28:27,800
belt, one Rd activity slowed
down in the middle of COVID for
558
00:28:27,800 --> 00:28:29,640
sure.
And since then I think has been
559
00:28:30,160 --> 00:28:32,360
pretty slow and and there are a
couple of reasons for that.
560
00:28:32,360 --> 00:28:34,840
The COVID 0 policies were
obviously a big chunk of the
561
00:28:34,840 --> 00:28:38,320
driving force.
The need to focus domestically
562
00:28:38,440 --> 00:28:41,880
has been important.
The trade war that then started
563
00:28:41,960 --> 00:28:45,200
of course before COVID with the
US probably had already been
564
00:28:45,200 --> 00:28:48,160
putting pressure in.
I think a lot of the focus is on
565
00:28:48,160 --> 00:28:50,840
national security as it relates
to strengthening the demand
566
00:28:50,920 --> 00:28:55,240
domestic economy as it focuses
on decoupling from the West, as
567
00:28:55,240 --> 00:28:58,200
it focuses on indigenization of
technology.
568
00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:02,280
And I think that's increasingly
taking on a lot of the policy
569
00:29:02,280 --> 00:29:06,720
focus off off the off the party.
I think a lot of the financing
570
00:29:06,920 --> 00:29:10,960
is also being redirected maybe
in, in, in part or a lot of the
571
00:29:10,960 --> 00:29:12,800
of the financial power
firepower.
572
00:29:12,800 --> 00:29:16,320
Now you're thinking about how to
use your your use your finances
573
00:29:16,600 --> 00:29:21,080
for those purposes and not just
to get into these projects
574
00:29:21,080 --> 00:29:23,280
abroad.
But then the other side is that,
575
00:29:23,280 --> 00:29:26,360
you know, China has been doing
one belt, one Rd for over did it
576
00:29:26,360 --> 00:29:30,880
did it for over a decade and
kind of started to realise it's,
577
00:29:30,920 --> 00:29:33,280
you know, where's the big the
big grand strategy.
578
00:29:33,400 --> 00:29:36,200
Parts of the argument make a lot
of sense and it and it sounds
579
00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:39,840
super sexy and people in DC
certainly were very alarmed by
580
00:29:40,480 --> 00:29:42,920
this stuff is hard to pull off.
These are very difficult
581
00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:45,680
countries to operate in.
These are very complicated
582
00:29:45,680 --> 00:29:49,120
markets to operate in.
And, you know, not only do you
583
00:29:49,120 --> 00:29:52,600
get into these areas are, are
these problems where the loans
584
00:29:52,600 --> 00:29:56,440
that you're giving out may never
get repaid, but you know, you're
585
00:29:56,440 --> 00:29:58,600
also putting your people at
risk.
586
00:29:58,600 --> 00:30:02,040
There's physical security also.
And that, you know, you could
587
00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:04,240
take the physical security and
perhaps you say, you know, yes,
588
00:30:04,240 --> 00:30:07,360
you're going to lose some people
to a terrorist attack or to an
589
00:30:07,360 --> 00:30:09,400
uprising because the locals
don't like it, to an armed
590
00:30:09,400 --> 00:30:11,520
uprising to locals and maybe in
an area don't like it.
591
00:30:11,840 --> 00:30:14,280
On top of that, you have to deal
with incredibly corrupt
592
00:30:15,520 --> 00:30:18,160
countries that are just having
incredibly corrupt, large
593
00:30:18,160 --> 00:30:20,560
amounts of corruption, just to
put it frankly, have an
594
00:30:20,560 --> 00:30:24,160
incredible amount of red tape,
both because of bureaucracies
595
00:30:24,720 --> 00:30:28,080
and because of the, the, the,
the way that the, you know,
596
00:30:28,080 --> 00:30:29,800
countries are structured
politically.
597
00:30:30,080 --> 00:30:33,600
And All in all, it ends up being
maybe the bang for your buck
598
00:30:33,600 --> 00:30:36,240
isn't so high.
Or maybe you know, you have to
599
00:30:36,800 --> 00:30:39,240
they maybe maybe people in
Beijing have wondered if so, you
600
00:30:39,320 --> 00:30:42,560
know, so to speak, the, the,
the, the juice is worth the
601
00:30:42,560 --> 00:30:44,040
squeeze.
So there I think multiple
602
00:30:44,040 --> 00:30:47,800
factors that have contributed
towards the pullback in the one
603
00:30:47,800 --> 00:30:54,680
belt, one Rd initiative.
And on, on the sort of topic of,
604
00:30:54,760 --> 00:30:59,560
yeah, China's Foreign Relations,
foreign policy, how do you see
605
00:30:59,560 --> 00:31:02,000
that also playing out?
One of the big themes coming out
606
00:31:02,000 --> 00:31:06,000
of COVID was this decoupling,
French shoring or reshoring,
607
00:31:06,000 --> 00:31:08,080
whatever you you like to call
it.
608
00:31:08,080 --> 00:31:15,320
Is, is that a, a trend that you
believe will just continue on?
609
00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:19,120
And maybe it's a bit out of your
area of expertise, but that that
610
00:31:19,120 --> 00:31:23,040
seems just very inflationary for
the, the the rest of the world.
611
00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:26,000
Is is that something that's
going to stay true throughout
612
00:31:26,000 --> 00:31:30,960
the the twenty 20s?
So, yeah, I mean, I think it has
613
00:31:30,960 --> 00:31:33,520
to be acknowledged that a big
chunk of the reason inflation
614
00:31:33,520 --> 00:31:38,480
was so low before COVID was
because of China, right?
615
00:31:38,480 --> 00:31:40,680
Because China was able to
produce, you could produce
616
00:31:40,680 --> 00:31:43,440
things in China at very, very
low levels.
617
00:31:43,440 --> 00:31:45,640
A lot of the low levels of
global inflation, at least in
618
00:31:45,640 --> 00:31:48,440
the Western, the developed world
that you got were thanks to
619
00:31:48,440 --> 00:31:50,160
China, at least in the United
States.
620
00:31:50,640 --> 00:31:54,280
But then what we also learn is
that some things can be too good
621
00:31:54,280 --> 00:31:56,560
to be true.
And when COVID hit and China
622
00:31:56,560 --> 00:32:00,320
shut down and China from a
political standpoint, became a
623
00:32:00,320 --> 00:32:03,760
very difficult country to deal
with because of the lack of
624
00:32:03,760 --> 00:32:07,640
transparency around what was
happening with COVID and, and
625
00:32:07,640 --> 00:32:10,880
dealing with COVID and COVID
policy and their desire to
626
00:32:10,880 --> 00:32:13,640
reject Western vaccines then and
say we're only going to rely on
627
00:32:13,640 --> 00:32:16,120
domestic vaccines.
And then those didn't really
628
00:32:16,120 --> 00:32:17,400
work.
And then you got repeated
629
00:32:17,400 --> 00:32:18,720
shutdowns.
And it created a lot of
630
00:32:19,120 --> 00:32:23,400
uncertainty and upheaval out
West that what we learned is our
631
00:32:23,400 --> 00:32:27,360
supply chains are very, very
insecure.
632
00:32:28,120 --> 00:32:32,120
And the insecurity of supply
chains then contributed towards
633
00:32:32,280 --> 00:32:36,960
historic levels of inflation,
certainly out in the United
634
00:32:36,960 --> 00:32:41,840
States and and also elsewhere.
So that has led to this idea
635
00:32:41,840 --> 00:32:45,800
that, OK, you cannot have all
your eggs in the China basket,
636
00:32:45,800 --> 00:32:48,440
that you must diversify supply
chains.
637
00:32:49,000 --> 00:32:51,880
It's been the added factor, of
course, is that it doesn't have
638
00:32:51,880 --> 00:32:58,520
to be a pandemic or an epidemic,
a, a, a health crisis that, that
639
00:32:58,560 --> 00:33:01,840
that's the only problem.
You could have geopolitical risk
640
00:33:02,080 --> 00:33:07,440
be another, another problem.
And so it's not safe to be
641
00:33:07,440 --> 00:33:09,800
wholly dependent if you're a
foreign producer or foreign
642
00:33:09,800 --> 00:33:12,200
company or even if you are a
foreign company that just buys
643
00:33:12,440 --> 00:33:16,200
from a domestic Chinese producer
to be entirely dependent on
644
00:33:16,360 --> 00:33:18,640
China.
So it's these factors that have
645
00:33:18,720 --> 00:33:21,680
led to policy pressure building
up, but also companies
646
00:33:21,680 --> 00:33:24,440
themselves, I think realising
that they need to diversify
647
00:33:24,800 --> 00:33:29,320
their supply chains and that
could absolutely carry the risk
648
00:33:29,320 --> 00:33:33,160
of being inflationary.
I think it'll certainly be more,
649
00:33:33,240 --> 00:33:35,000
you know, there will be higher
inflation.
650
00:33:35,000 --> 00:33:37,680
We are in a higher inflation
environment, likely remain in a
651
00:33:37,680 --> 00:33:41,120
higher inflation environment
than we than we were pre COVID,
652
00:33:42,040 --> 00:33:43,960
at least at least in the
foreseeable future.
653
00:33:44,640 --> 00:33:48,440
But there is a sort of the
necessity now to avoid the
654
00:33:48,440 --> 00:33:51,640
downside risk of what what it is
to partner with, with with China
655
00:33:51,880 --> 00:33:53,680
that you have playing up on the
other side.
656
00:33:54,080 --> 00:33:56,440
The decoupling, I think you're
absolutely it's going to be
657
00:33:56,440 --> 00:33:58,040
selective decoupling.
I think it's going to be
658
00:33:58,040 --> 00:34:00,040
particular industries.
It's not, it's not decoupling
659
00:34:00,040 --> 00:34:03,000
across the board, but especially
when, when industries that are
660
00:34:03,080 --> 00:34:06,920
seen as very, very important,
whether it's, you know, critical
661
00:34:06,920 --> 00:34:10,320
minerals, whether it's certain
technological outputs, whether
662
00:34:10,320 --> 00:34:12,040
it's, it's certain.
Of course, you know, we talked
663
00:34:12,040 --> 00:34:14,920
about medical, the medical
industry.
664
00:34:14,920 --> 00:34:17,199
I think I think you certainly
get, I think you certainly get
665
00:34:17,199 --> 00:34:19,719
decoupling going on over there.
There's also other parts of
666
00:34:19,719 --> 00:34:21,920
decoupling, by the way, which is
decoupling in the financial
667
00:34:21,920 --> 00:34:24,400
space, the decoupling in the
technological space, which are
668
00:34:24,400 --> 00:34:27,960
national security priorities and
prerogatives of of policy makers
669
00:34:27,960 --> 00:34:30,120
out West.
Slowing down technology
670
00:34:30,120 --> 00:34:32,360
transfer, technology transfer
technology to China as it
671
00:34:32,360 --> 00:34:35,800
relates to selling them trips or
advancement, you know, are
672
00:34:35,800 --> 00:34:38,199
things that would go into making
them an advanced manufacturing,
673
00:34:38,199 --> 00:34:42,040
a powerhouse and advanced
manufacturing and financial
674
00:34:42,040 --> 00:34:43,960
decoupling.
Similarly, putting money into
675
00:34:43,960 --> 00:34:46,880
Chinese companies that tomorrow
could develop the technology
676
00:34:46,960 --> 00:34:50,120
that could be used by China or
the, you know, the Chinese
677
00:34:50,120 --> 00:34:53,440
military to gain increasingly
become more and more dominant as
678
00:34:53,440 --> 00:34:56,440
a military, a player military
eventually become a military
679
00:34:56,440 --> 00:34:59,520
superpower in the world, that
one that rivals the United
680
00:34:59,520 --> 00:35:03,160
States and its Western allies.
So, so you've got all of that
681
00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:04,960
playing outside Mojave.
See, that's all true.
682
00:35:04,960 --> 00:35:06,840
And, and let me stop at the last
point.
683
00:35:06,960 --> 00:35:10,000
There's what I like to
constantly remind folks of China
684
00:35:10,000 --> 00:35:11,960
decoupling from the West, which
I talked about earlier.
685
00:35:12,160 --> 00:35:15,520
So there's there's decoupling
happening across the board.
686
00:35:15,520 --> 00:35:17,600
It's happening in in various
shapes and forms.
687
00:35:17,800 --> 00:35:19,440
And it's not just a western LED
thing.
688
00:35:19,520 --> 00:35:22,600
It's actually, you've got the
the Chinese policy makers and Xi
689
00:35:22,600 --> 00:35:27,080
Jinping himself saying we need
to lessen our reliance on on the
690
00:35:27,080 --> 00:35:31,200
West, especially in the domain
of of various technological
691
00:35:31,200 --> 00:35:32,360
goods and inputs that they rely
on.
692
00:35:32,720 --> 00:35:36,200
Is is anywhere in the world ever
going to be as cheap as China in
693
00:35:36,200 --> 00:35:38,400
the future?
Is there ever going to be an
694
00:35:38,400 --> 00:35:43,600
alternative?
Probably not because it's, it's
695
00:35:43,720 --> 00:35:46,000
probably going to be very hard
to find another country in the
696
00:35:46,000 --> 00:35:50,400
foreseeable future that is both
has as large a, a communist
697
00:35:50,440 --> 00:35:56,720
country and at a place where you
could just have rates as low as
698
00:35:56,720 --> 00:35:59,360
possible.
Which by the way, is a kind of a
699
00:35:59,360 --> 00:36:01,560
problem, right?
It's as we think about labour
700
00:36:01,560 --> 00:36:05,080
rights around the world and as
you think about things that are,
701
00:36:05,120 --> 00:36:08,320
you know, you know, you know,
you know, standard of working
702
00:36:08,320 --> 00:36:09,920
and so forth.
It's not the greatest thing,
703
00:36:09,920 --> 00:36:11,800
right?
So, so they, it comes and
704
00:36:11,800 --> 00:36:15,760
someone pays the cost for those
very, very cheap goods that that
705
00:36:15,760 --> 00:36:17,160
we've been able to benefit off
of.
706
00:36:17,160 --> 00:36:19,600
And I think that that's becoming
harder and harder to see.
707
00:36:19,600 --> 00:36:22,360
I think places like India, which
could again, be a little bit
708
00:36:22,680 --> 00:36:26,280
competitive, you know, I don't
think you could keep, you know,
709
00:36:26,280 --> 00:36:28,320
have labour there, ultimately be
as cheap.
710
00:36:28,440 --> 00:36:31,000
And there are all sorts of other
problems in these other places,
711
00:36:31,040 --> 00:36:33,800
lack of training, lack of
infrastructure and so forth.
712
00:36:33,960 --> 00:36:38,480
Well, one of the one of the the
products that has sort of hit us
713
00:36:38,480 --> 00:36:42,000
in the face with how how
noticeably cheaper it is China
714
00:36:42,000 --> 00:36:43,920
made than elsewhere is electric
vehicles.
715
00:36:44,360 --> 00:36:48,120
And we, we can see it in, in
Perth now BYD, they're they're
716
00:36:48,280 --> 00:36:52,240
popping up shops on, you know,
numerous corners where it used
717
00:36:52,240 --> 00:36:55,840
to be a, a western car maker.
And they're not.
718
00:36:55,840 --> 00:36:57,480
It's not like they're shitter
love you.
719
00:36:57,720 --> 00:37:00,880
People like BYDS better than
Tesla's and they're it's
720
00:37:00,880 --> 00:37:03,560
cheaper.
It's not yet like you're not
721
00:37:03,560 --> 00:37:06,400
sacrificing quality.
Either yeah, the quality reviews
722
00:37:06,400 --> 00:37:08,240
from everyone I've heard is top
notch.
723
00:37:08,240 --> 00:37:12,960
They are in no way inferior to
maybe in in brand status, but in
724
00:37:12,960 --> 00:37:18,600
no actual tangible way are they
cheaper in in quality to a
725
00:37:18,600 --> 00:37:21,880
western car.
Now on the on the topic of, you
726
00:37:21,880 --> 00:37:24,360
know, countries being friendly
with with one another, we've
727
00:37:24,360 --> 00:37:28,160
seen enormous tariffs on on EVs
and Australia smartly hasn't
728
00:37:28,160 --> 00:37:33,040
whacked them on because we're so
reliant on on China, but how
729
00:37:33,040 --> 00:37:35,560
long can that really last?
Obviously a lot of these
730
00:37:35,560 --> 00:37:37,760
countries that whack on the
tariffs are protecting
731
00:37:37,880 --> 00:37:42,360
industries of their own that
that seems in, in my kind of
732
00:37:42,360 --> 00:37:46,000
view to have a, a finite date in
which, you know, that their OEMs
733
00:37:46,000 --> 00:37:48,600
have to get to a, a standard
where they're just producing a,
734
00:37:48,640 --> 00:37:50,240
a better vehicle.
But what what's your view on
735
00:37:50,240 --> 00:37:54,360
that Chasad?
Yeah, look, I think so Chinese
736
00:37:54,360 --> 00:37:56,640
TV is right.
It's a classic story of how
737
00:37:56,640 --> 00:38:02,240
China is able to dominate
global, you know, industries
738
00:38:02,240 --> 00:38:03,400
across the world.
And.
739
00:38:03,400 --> 00:38:07,040
And So what do they do?
They provide so much subsidies,
740
00:38:07,040 --> 00:38:11,400
so many subsidies for so long
that it becomes incredibly dirt
741
00:38:11,400 --> 00:38:15,080
cheap to produce this product,
in this case, E VS it for, you
742
00:38:15,080 --> 00:38:18,920
know, it allows for a lot of
companies to prop up to do the
743
00:38:18,920 --> 00:38:22,240
same thing, this steal a little
bit of technology from from
744
00:38:22,240 --> 00:38:23,760
Tesla.
And then they continue to, you
745
00:38:23,760 --> 00:38:26,040
know, they work on that and
improve on that and so forth.
746
00:38:26,680 --> 00:38:29,360
And two things have happened as
a result of what you just
747
00:38:29,360 --> 00:38:31,280
described there.
They've flooded the world with
748
00:38:31,280 --> 00:38:33,960
with, with their cheap cars,
which as you correctly said, are
749
00:38:33,960 --> 00:38:38,600
not, you know, necessarily worse
quality and, and they happen to
750
00:38:38,600 --> 00:38:40,560
be a fraction of the price U.S.
dollars.
751
00:38:40,560 --> 00:38:44,000
You can sell a car for $10,000
that is very cheap.
752
00:38:44,800 --> 00:38:47,560
I mean.
You're right.
753
00:38:47,680 --> 00:38:51,080
It's, it's insane.
And it's also, of course,
754
00:38:51,080 --> 00:38:53,440
created the alternative problem
where domestically now you've
755
00:38:53,440 --> 00:38:57,240
got Chinese EV makers who are
just struggling because there's,
756
00:38:57,240 --> 00:38:59,160
there's so many, there's so
many, there's so much
757
00:38:59,160 --> 00:39:01,840
competition and everything is so
cheap that the bottom line is
758
00:39:01,840 --> 00:39:04,360
hurting for them.
So what do you do about that if
759
00:39:04,360 --> 00:39:06,360
you're United States or if
you're, if you're, if you're
760
00:39:06,360 --> 00:39:08,920
Europe?
Because no matter how many
761
00:39:08,920 --> 00:39:12,840
subsidies you levy on, so the
$10,000 car with 100% subsidies,
762
00:39:12,840 --> 00:39:16,240
subsidies becomes a $20,000 car.
And you know, with two 100%
763
00:39:16,240 --> 00:39:19,640
subsidies, you know, so on and
so forth, But your own producers
764
00:39:19,640 --> 00:39:24,560
still cannot compete.
So you're, you're, you're stuck
765
00:39:24,560 --> 00:39:28,080
in a difficult place because if
you want your consumers to have
766
00:39:28,080 --> 00:39:31,800
access to a cheap product that
is good and he wanted to be
767
00:39:31,800 --> 00:39:35,400
produced by and large with, by a
local producer, whether maybe
768
00:39:35,400 --> 00:39:37,440
they still do it in a different
jurisdiction.
769
00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:40,520
You still have to throw a lot of
money at them.
770
00:39:40,520 --> 00:39:43,440
You have to heavily subsidised
them if you're a western market
771
00:39:43,680 --> 00:39:46,160
to do that.
So, so that's the the struggle
772
00:39:46,160 --> 00:39:50,520
now that I think, at least from
an American standpoint, American
773
00:39:50,520 --> 00:39:52,600
policy makers are going to be
facing the Biden administration
774
00:39:52,600 --> 00:39:55,520
put on those those tariffs, but
they're not in themselves going
775
00:39:55,520 --> 00:39:57,160
to be good enough.
The Chinese say, OK, forget
776
00:39:57,160 --> 00:40:00,040
about it, let's get into Mexico
and just produce the cars in
777
00:40:00,040 --> 00:40:01,240
Mexico.
And sure, they'll be a little
778
00:40:01,240 --> 00:40:03,520
bit more expensive, but they'll
still be considerably cheaper
779
00:40:03,680 --> 00:40:06,040
than what any other American car
manufacturer can do.
780
00:40:06,360 --> 00:40:08,680
So, so now you get into this
other tussle of how do you
781
00:40:08,680 --> 00:40:10,920
define what's a Chinese car
versus a Mexican car?
782
00:40:11,240 --> 00:40:14,680
All that's to say, it is very,
very difficult and very, very
783
00:40:14,680 --> 00:40:18,040
complicated.
You know, to do so, of course,
784
00:40:18,160 --> 00:40:21,800
keep in mind we don't have
Chinese EVs in the United States
785
00:40:21,800 --> 00:40:25,040
today.
So, so once you let them in, it
786
00:40:25,040 --> 00:40:27,320
might be hard to, you know,
force them out.
787
00:40:28,080 --> 00:40:30,600
But if you don't let them in,
your consumers are worse off,
788
00:40:30,880 --> 00:40:34,080
but your domestic car
manufacturing industry is happy.
789
00:40:34,080 --> 00:40:36,080
And you're, and you're, and that
part of the electorate and the,
790
00:40:36,120 --> 00:40:37,400
and the labour market, of
course.
791
00:40:37,640 --> 00:40:40,320
And those workers and those
unions are certainly going to be
792
00:40:40,600 --> 00:40:42,600
very happy.
So it's, it's this, it's this
793
00:40:42,600 --> 00:40:45,480
political tightrope of, of in
many ways that you have to walk.
794
00:40:46,960 --> 00:40:53,040
China put forward the, the goal
of net 0 by 2060 I I believe and
795
00:40:53,280 --> 00:40:57,520
EVs is 1 component, but it also
ties in very strongly with what
796
00:40:57,520 --> 00:41:00,760
you said earlier with a, a
national security and a China
797
00:41:00,760 --> 00:41:02,920
sort of independence kind of
focus.
798
00:41:02,920 --> 00:41:06,920
What do you make of that, that
goal and and their journey to
799
00:41:06,920 --> 00:41:09,400
get there with the, we've also
seen them go pretty hard at at
800
00:41:09,400 --> 00:41:11,960
nuclear and other sort of
sources to really wean down
801
00:41:11,960 --> 00:41:15,200
there their reliance on on all
other countries.
802
00:41:15,200 --> 00:41:17,320
Have you got a sort of
differentiated view on their
803
00:41:17,320 --> 00:41:21,760
journey to get there?
Look, I don't have a a view on
804
00:41:21,760 --> 00:41:25,360
this one, but I will say that,
you know, one of the things that
805
00:41:25,360 --> 00:41:28,800
we are certainly seeing though
over the last few years is that
806
00:41:28,800 --> 00:41:35,600
that reliance on coal is pretty
high and there is a lot of coal
807
00:41:35,600 --> 00:41:39,160
being produced in China.
And when it's cheaper for them
808
00:41:39,160 --> 00:41:42,360
to import it, they certainly are
importing it and a pretty high
809
00:41:42,360 --> 00:41:46,120
quality, you know, quantities.
So if, if you are a trading
810
00:41:46,120 --> 00:41:48,600
coal, if you are interested in
understanding where China's
811
00:41:48,920 --> 00:41:51,640
would that trend has been in
terms of coal, coal production
812
00:41:51,640 --> 00:41:55,360
for as it feeds into not only
just steel, because China's also
813
00:41:55,360 --> 00:41:59,560
producing a tonne of steel, so
much steel that they're just, as
814
00:41:59,560 --> 00:42:03,040
I said earlier, just pushing it
abroad, exporting it abroad.
815
00:42:03,040 --> 00:42:05,680
That's been a driver of, of
growth for them, their export
816
00:42:05,680 --> 00:42:09,120
growth, but also just for
domestic energy purposes.
817
00:42:09,840 --> 00:42:13,160
So, so I'm not an energy these
specialists, I don't have a call
818
00:42:13,160 --> 00:42:16,280
or a view on their net 0
emission targets for, you know,
819
00:42:16,440 --> 00:42:20,440
for the future.
But I think we have to keep in
820
00:42:20,440 --> 00:42:22,760
mind that the certainly their
reliance on on the fossil fuel,
821
00:42:22,760 --> 00:42:25,120
certainly their reliance on coal
remains pretty serious and
822
00:42:25,120 --> 00:42:28,800
pretty severe.
On, on the matter of steel,
823
00:42:28,800 --> 00:42:31,760
that's that's another one where
we've seen tariffs kick up just,
824
00:42:31,760 --> 00:42:35,960
I think last week and send the,
the Canadians ratchet up defence
825
00:42:35,960 --> 00:42:38,600
because China, I think in their
words, is just drowning the
826
00:42:38,600 --> 00:42:41,680
world in steel.
What does that kind of lead to?
827
00:42:44,000 --> 00:42:45,320
Yeah.
That's, I mean that's been one
828
00:42:45,320 --> 00:42:47,720
of the things we've been
tracking for the last, you know,
829
00:42:48,760 --> 00:42:52,240
over the last year we've seen,
you know, especially over 2023,
830
00:42:52,240 --> 00:42:54,920
we saw a lot more steel
production than was expected
831
00:42:55,240 --> 00:42:57,600
coming out of China.
Beginning of that last year, the
832
00:42:57,600 --> 00:42:59,560
idea was that Chinese steel
production was actually going to
833
00:42:59,880 --> 00:43:02,600
continue to decline for a third
year and that that didn't
834
00:43:02,600 --> 00:43:07,480
happen.
So, and ultimately we found that
835
00:43:07,840 --> 00:43:09,960
a lot of that steel was making
its way over abroad.
836
00:43:10,560 --> 00:43:13,760
Most recently, we're again
actually seeing, we have seen a,
837
00:43:13,760 --> 00:43:19,760
a, the seasonal kick kick up in
Chinese steel production over
838
00:43:19,760 --> 00:43:22,560
August, over September, even
though it was muted earlier in
839
00:43:22,560 --> 00:43:23,960
the year.
Sort of, you know, you, you had
840
00:43:23,960 --> 00:43:26,200
sort of this decline taking
place in Chinese steel
841
00:43:26,200 --> 00:43:27,480
production.
Now we'll see if it continues
842
00:43:27,480 --> 00:43:29,280
through the rest of the, the
year.
843
00:43:29,280 --> 00:43:32,760
But the bottom line is that in
an overall economic environment
844
00:43:32,760 --> 00:43:35,880
where there is a slowdown, there
has been this doubling down on
845
00:43:35,880 --> 00:43:38,800
the industrial side of the
economy and specifically on the
846
00:43:38,800 --> 00:43:41,640
commodity side of the economy,
where you may be losing money
847
00:43:41,640 --> 00:43:44,320
and you may not be making a
tonne of money along the way and
848
00:43:44,320 --> 00:43:45,920
you may be having to cut down
prices.
849
00:43:46,560 --> 00:43:48,080
But the plants are pumping it
out.
850
00:43:48,400 --> 00:43:52,680
The regional and provincial
political authorities are, are
851
00:43:52,680 --> 00:43:56,200
not forcing the steel plants to
cut back on production.
852
00:43:56,200 --> 00:43:58,920
And ultimately, you know,
whether it's through a
853
00:43:58,920 --> 00:44:02,320
combination of subsidies or
other means, you know, people
854
00:44:02,320 --> 00:44:04,920
are being kept employed, which
is important.
855
00:44:05,760 --> 00:44:09,200
And, and that and the, and the
excess product because there's,
856
00:44:09,200 --> 00:44:12,080
there's nowhere near the demand
domestically.
857
00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,000
Then, then, you know, then the
output that you're getting is,
858
00:44:15,000 --> 00:44:18,240
is finding its way in foreign
markets and you're finally
859
00:44:18,240 --> 00:44:24,120
getting the political sort of
response for it as, as you know,
860
00:44:24,160 --> 00:44:27,000
as, as is predictable.
The real question, of course,
861
00:44:27,000 --> 00:44:29,520
is, you know, where, where do we
get in this cat and mouse game,
862
00:44:29,520 --> 00:44:31,840
right?
Are subsidies, as are are are
863
00:44:31,840 --> 00:44:35,800
tariffs going to eventually be
high enough to cause enough pain
864
00:44:36,040 --> 00:44:39,720
to where you see China change
tack or ultimately the IT is
865
00:44:40,000 --> 00:44:42,480
fundamentally so cheap for them
to do this that their, their
866
00:44:42,520 --> 00:44:46,680
ability to withstand the pain is
is way, way, way higher than
867
00:44:46,680 --> 00:44:50,760
perhaps even the political will
in these countries for raising
868
00:44:50,760 --> 00:44:53,080
tariffs.
So, so that's the battle that's
869
00:44:53,080 --> 00:44:57,800
about to play out, especially as
we look to 2025 onwards and we
870
00:44:57,800 --> 00:45:00,720
get towards this, you know,
renewed trade war.
871
00:45:00,720 --> 00:45:02,840
Especially.
I think you get this round two
872
00:45:02,840 --> 00:45:06,640
of AUS China trade war going
into effect and we begin to find
873
00:45:06,640 --> 00:45:09,120
out how much pain can the
Chinese side withstand and just
874
00:45:09,120 --> 00:45:12,520
how and what it is and how much
and how many tariffs and how
875
00:45:12,520 --> 00:45:15,320
quickly can an American
president really started levying
876
00:45:15,320 --> 00:45:18,120
tariffs on whether whether it's
a Trump administration or or a
877
00:45:18,120 --> 00:45:21,880
Harris administration.
Is it too simplistic to to think
878
00:45:21,880 --> 00:45:26,560
that the reason there's so much
more steel exports in in the the
879
00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:30,360
past few months and year or so
is because they don't want to
880
00:45:30,360 --> 00:45:32,480
consume it or need to consume it
in country?
881
00:45:34,040 --> 00:45:35,920
Yeah, that's, that's a big chunk
of it, right.
882
00:45:35,920 --> 00:45:38,680
So, so they're producing.
So they're producing a lot
883
00:45:38,760 --> 00:45:41,400
regardless of what's going on
domestically because it's one of
884
00:45:41,400 --> 00:45:44,200
the areas that is, it is one of
the areas they have doubled down
885
00:45:44,200 --> 00:45:47,840
on industrial, you know, the
industrial sector writ large,
886
00:45:47,840 --> 00:45:50,880
manufacturing absolutely off
goods like, you know, whether it
887
00:45:50,880 --> 00:45:53,840
be apparel or cars or whatever
you make.
888
00:45:54,040 --> 00:45:57,400
But commodities manufacturing
is, has been a big part of of
889
00:45:57,680 --> 00:46:01,600
the story, especially over 2023
and now into 2024.
890
00:46:02,560 --> 00:46:06,480
But yes, it's absolutely true
that the props, they have no
891
00:46:06,480 --> 00:46:08,640
reason to consume as much of it
because of what's happened in
892
00:46:08,640 --> 00:46:11,680
the property market, the
downturn in the property market
893
00:46:11,680 --> 00:46:14,480
and the, and the very, very low
levels of construction activity.
894
00:46:14,480 --> 00:46:17,800
And absolutely the low levels
of, of infrastructure
895
00:46:17,800 --> 00:46:20,760
development in China have meant
that the domestic need and the
896
00:46:20,760 --> 00:46:25,640
domestic demand for these
industrial metals is far more
897
00:46:25,640 --> 00:46:27,880
than what it used to be.
And so you're left with a lot of
898
00:46:27,880 --> 00:46:30,920
excess product that you are then
dumping abroad.
899
00:46:31,560 --> 00:46:37,840
So that if we look forward, say
to 202050, how do you think
900
00:46:37,840 --> 00:46:43,480
China compares in, in terms of,
you know, power in the world, in
901
00:46:43,480 --> 00:46:48,440
terms of its economy size, in
terms of GDP per capita with the
902
00:46:48,640 --> 00:46:51,680
US and other countries that you
might think are running pretty
903
00:46:51,680 --> 00:46:53,880
quickly?
So, you know, I think in the
904
00:46:53,880 --> 00:46:57,600
aftermath of COVID and, you
know, the slow down in the
905
00:46:57,600 --> 00:47:00,560
Chinese economy and then the
acknowledgement from the
906
00:47:00,560 --> 00:47:03,160
Communist Party that look, we're
looking at a future of slower
907
00:47:03,160 --> 00:47:05,040
growth and we're going to make
it more sustainable and so
908
00:47:05,040 --> 00:47:07,000
forth.
It became really, it's really
909
00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:13,320
fashionable both by on the, on
the, on the street and in the
910
00:47:13,320 --> 00:47:17,320
policy making world to sort of
have these doomsday predictions
911
00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:21,200
about China, that the Chinese
economy ultimately will, you
912
00:47:21,200 --> 00:47:25,760
know, get stuck in, in, in, in,
in period of stagnation.
913
00:47:26,760 --> 00:47:29,160
That they're going to, you know,
or that, you know, parts of the
914
00:47:29,160 --> 00:47:31,080
Chinese economy are just going
to simply fall apart.
915
00:47:31,480 --> 00:47:33,880
Or that there's going to be this
big Lehman moment that's going
916
00:47:33,880 --> 00:47:35,840
to take place and the financial
system is just going to
917
00:47:35,840 --> 00:47:38,360
absolutely crash.
And that's going to be the doom
918
00:47:38,360 --> 00:47:41,640
scenario.
And and the policy making side
919
00:47:41,640 --> 00:47:44,720
of the world, especially out in
DC has a similar viewpoint that
920
00:47:44,720 --> 00:47:47,880
that whereas today, you know,
we're concerned about China as a
921
00:47:47,880 --> 00:47:51,600
competitor of ours or as a as a
global rival, that I think
922
00:47:51,600 --> 00:47:54,200
they're just going to internally
implode because of all the
923
00:47:54,200 --> 00:47:56,680
various economic problems that
they have.
924
00:47:56,680 --> 00:47:59,040
And then the House of Cards is
going to collapse and so forth.
925
00:47:59,440 --> 00:48:04,080
I don't buy that at all.
So, you know, what I think is
926
00:48:04,080 --> 00:48:07,440
you get as an economy that
remains at the very least the
927
00:48:07,440 --> 00:48:11,920
world's second largest economy
that, yes, grew at a very slow
928
00:48:11,920 --> 00:48:14,720
pace.
Do I believe today that they
929
00:48:14,720 --> 00:48:19,520
magically pull off that great
economic transition that they
930
00:48:19,520 --> 00:48:22,080
that they foresee?
It's which I compared to sort of
931
00:48:22,080 --> 00:48:26,440
turning around a huge, huge,
huge, huge ship.
932
00:48:26,680 --> 00:48:28,840
I used to call it turning around
the Titanic.
933
00:48:28,840 --> 00:48:30,920
And then somebody interviewing
me says Shahzad.
934
00:48:30,920 --> 00:48:33,240
The Titanic sank.
So I said, you're right, I
935
00:48:33,240 --> 00:48:35,000
should have gone on that
because.
936
00:48:35,640 --> 00:48:41,640
People still going.
So, but it's still a kid to
937
00:48:41,640 --> 00:48:45,040
turning around a very, very
large vessel.
938
00:48:45,400 --> 00:48:48,920
And I don't think the successes
at all guaranteed.
939
00:48:49,120 --> 00:48:52,160
I don't think they're doing
things today that even give me
940
00:48:52,160 --> 00:48:54,280
confidence that they're going to
necessarily succeed.
941
00:48:54,520 --> 00:48:58,520
But I don't buy this idea that
China implodes and becomes sort
942
00:48:58,520 --> 00:49:01,880
of this very man, you know,
economy.
943
00:49:01,880 --> 00:49:03,800
I think you could get a
combination of things.
944
00:49:03,800 --> 00:49:06,760
You get an economy that grows at
a very low level, maybe even
945
00:49:06,760 --> 00:49:08,680
goes through some periods where
it doesn't grow at all.
946
00:49:08,960 --> 00:49:12,120
But then at the same time, they
have been able to make the right
947
00:49:12,120 --> 00:49:15,600
decisions in the area of
technological growth that they
948
00:49:15,600 --> 00:49:19,160
do have an important, if not a
dominant position in, in high
949
00:49:19,280 --> 00:49:21,560
end manufacturing of
technological goods that they, I
950
00:49:21,560 --> 00:49:24,520
think do get, end up getting
some amounts of, you know,
951
00:49:24,520 --> 00:49:28,920
indigenization of, of, of
advanced technology and and so
952
00:49:28,920 --> 00:49:30,080
forth.
I think, I think they, I think
953
00:49:30,080 --> 00:49:34,200
they'll likely accomplish some
of those goals and become this
954
00:49:34,200 --> 00:49:40,040
big important military
powerhouse around the world.
955
00:49:40,040 --> 00:49:43,880
There's they're still very large
being #2 is very impressive if
956
00:49:43,880 --> 00:49:47,560
that, if they remain that not
even being #3 is very impressive
957
00:49:47,840 --> 00:49:49,880
in this world.
So I think so.
958
00:49:49,920 --> 00:49:52,240
So, you know, we have to think
about a China from that
959
00:49:52,240 --> 00:49:55,840
standpoint, both, you know, from
an investing position as well.
960
00:49:55,840 --> 00:49:59,400
By the way, the overall slowdown
may not mean much.
961
00:49:59,400 --> 00:50:03,160
I think opportunities in China
increasingly lie below the
962
00:50:03,160 --> 00:50:04,720
surface.
And it's time to get very, very
963
00:50:04,720 --> 00:50:07,040
serious and sophisticated about
the Chinese economy.
964
00:50:07,320 --> 00:50:09,280
Because if you're just looking
at the overall GDP number and
965
00:50:09,280 --> 00:50:12,240
investing based on that, as used
as everybody who invested in
966
00:50:12,240 --> 00:50:14,520
China more or less did, you're
not going to make any money
967
00:50:14,520 --> 00:50:16,120
anymore.
You have to get very real about
968
00:50:16,120 --> 00:50:18,120
where are some money flowing
internally in China?
969
00:50:18,320 --> 00:50:20,440
What are the opportunity
industries of the common, you
970
00:50:20,440 --> 00:50:22,400
know, that are being created
because the Communist Party
971
00:50:22,400 --> 00:50:25,880
backs those industries and those
are the pick the, the favoured
972
00:50:26,520 --> 00:50:29,800
areas of growth and likely areas
where the opportunities lie,
973
00:50:29,800 --> 00:50:32,640
where there's, you know, ability
to make money.
974
00:50:33,240 --> 00:50:35,920
And I think same from a, from a
thinking about assessing the
975
00:50:35,920 --> 00:50:39,360
geopolitical risk and assessing
China's geopolitical entity.
976
00:50:39,480 --> 00:50:42,400
I think start focusing not just
on this overall picture, but
977
00:50:42,400 --> 00:50:43,560
really what they're getting
right.
978
00:50:43,560 --> 00:50:45,680
And then and then where the risk
factors are, where they might
979
00:50:45,680 --> 00:50:48,480
fall behind or may just fail
outright and not succeed.
980
00:50:49,840 --> 00:50:53,280
You made the comment earlier of
China wanting to become less
981
00:50:53,280 --> 00:50:57,640
reliant on the West and tying
this in with, you know, it's
982
00:50:57,680 --> 00:51:01,760
it's recent military dominance
and it's also been a powerhouse
983
00:51:01,760 --> 00:51:05,520
for for 2000 odd years or maybe
even longer, just very kind of
984
00:51:06,400 --> 00:51:09,720
inward focused.
Do you think over the coming
985
00:51:09,720 --> 00:51:15,160
decades they look more and more
inward and perhaps you know,
986
00:51:15,160 --> 00:51:18,920
reflecting on the, on the China
of the, the 1900s, they really
987
00:51:18,920 --> 00:51:23,000
try and wean themselves off all
sorts of reliance of the, the
988
00:51:23,000 --> 00:51:29,680
outer kind of world?
What it's the what they want to
989
00:51:29,680 --> 00:51:33,200
wean off is their reliance on
Western countries for things
990
00:51:33,200 --> 00:51:38,200
like, so they, they don't want
to rely on NVIDIA for chips or
991
00:51:38,200 --> 00:51:41,800
they don't want to rely on on
ASML for lithography technology
992
00:51:41,800 --> 00:51:44,640
and machinery, right?
It's it's, they want to figure
993
00:51:44,640 --> 00:51:47,000
out a way to produce the
advanced ships themselves.
994
00:51:47,000 --> 00:51:50,240
They want to figure out a way to
produce the machinery to produce
995
00:51:50,520 --> 00:51:53,040
the chips and and then take it
to other areas.
996
00:51:53,320 --> 00:51:55,920
You know, off of, you know, when
we, when we think of advanced
997
00:51:55,920 --> 00:51:59,000
technology, you know, they've,
they've already done it for
998
00:51:59,000 --> 00:52:00,440
obviously.
And in the EV they've, they've
999
00:52:00,440 --> 00:52:02,360
shown their dominance in the EV
world.
1000
00:52:02,560 --> 00:52:05,320
They've shown how they can do,
they've taken over the global
1001
00:52:05,320 --> 00:52:09,200
solar, the solar panel market,
obviously, right.
1002
00:52:09,440 --> 00:52:13,600
So they've shown us how they can
make, how they can do more that
1003
00:52:13,600 --> 00:52:15,840
it's that China is not just
there to produce your T-shirts
1004
00:52:15,840 --> 00:52:17,360
and your, and your, and your
sneakers.
1005
00:52:17,560 --> 00:52:20,200
They can be doing things that
are far, far, far more advanced
1006
00:52:21,160 --> 00:52:24,080
and, and important to national
security and military and
1007
00:52:24,080 --> 00:52:25,880
military superiority and so
forth.
1008
00:52:26,120 --> 00:52:29,560
So I think they, they pull, they
continue to pull back in those
1009
00:52:29,560 --> 00:52:34,120
areas, but but I don't think
they pull back in other areas.
1010
00:52:34,120 --> 00:52:37,360
I think you get a China that
continues to focus on building
1011
00:52:37,360 --> 00:52:40,800
alliances broad and building and
friendships abroad.
1012
00:52:42,200 --> 00:52:45,720
You know, do I, I think do they,
do you get a China that tries to
1013
00:52:45,720 --> 00:52:49,320
mimic typically what's the
United States done since since
1014
00:52:49,320 --> 00:52:52,480
World War 2 and, and and
thereafter where we are sort of
1015
00:52:52,480 --> 00:52:54,520
the, you know, the policeman of
the world and involved in
1016
00:52:54,760 --> 00:52:57,000
conflicts everywhere and and and
so forth?
1017
00:52:57,000 --> 00:52:58,720
No, I don't think so.
I think, I think that I think
1018
00:52:58,720 --> 00:53:00,640
that you probably get more
continuity than not.
1019
00:53:00,920 --> 00:53:03,400
I don't think there's any
urgency when it comes to Chinese
1020
00:53:03,400 --> 00:53:08,920
policymakers to get involved in
in hot hostile conflicts that
1021
00:53:08,920 --> 00:53:12,200
are there actually wars, whether
they are, you know, skirmishes
1022
00:53:12,200 --> 00:53:14,560
or insurgencies or hot wars or
so forth.
1023
00:53:14,560 --> 00:53:17,600
Yes, they want to place world if
they can bring people together
1024
00:53:17,920 --> 00:53:22,920
around a table and get them to,
you know, you know, hash out a
1025
00:53:22,920 --> 00:53:25,840
friendship agreement or maybe
restart a dialogue the way they
1026
00:53:25,840 --> 00:53:29,200
did with the Iranians and and
the Saudis and so forth.
1027
00:53:29,200 --> 00:53:31,840
Yeah, they want to be on the
table as a as a as somebody that
1028
00:53:31,840 --> 00:53:34,560
can negotiate deals and that can
create stability.
1029
00:53:35,080 --> 00:53:37,000
But you know, they're doing it
at a very low level because
1030
00:53:37,000 --> 00:53:38,720
they're the risk of failure is
very high and they're not
1031
00:53:38,720 --> 00:53:40,840
putting their stamp on it and
and putting the reputation
1032
00:53:40,840 --> 00:53:42,720
behind it either.
So they're going for the low
1033
00:53:42,720 --> 00:53:45,400
hanging fruit in many ways.
So I think they stay involved
1034
00:53:45,400 --> 00:53:50,120
globally in, in these, in, in
this manner, in these, in these
1035
00:53:50,120 --> 00:53:51,840
ways.
I don't see them turning inward
1036
00:53:52,000 --> 00:53:53,000
at all.
They can't afford to.
1037
00:53:53,000 --> 00:53:55,600
As a matter of fact, a big chunk
of their focus is outward.
1038
00:53:55,600 --> 00:53:57,680
It's projecting their power in
the South China Sea.
1039
00:53:57,680 --> 00:54:00,560
It's, you know, projecting their
power and, and, and, and, and,
1040
00:54:00,560 --> 00:54:03,080
you know, keeping open that
option of retaking Taiwan.
1041
00:54:04,000 --> 00:54:07,480
It is about, you know, showing
the Philippines and that, that
1042
00:54:07,480 --> 00:54:11,000
they're the bigger power and
they are boss and, and, and, you
1043
00:54:11,000 --> 00:54:14,240
know, sending that message
across to other nations in Asia,
1044
00:54:14,240 --> 00:54:16,640
which are, which may not be
particularly friendly towards
1045
00:54:17,200 --> 00:54:22,240
Chinese interests any longer.
Start.
1046
00:54:22,240 --> 00:54:23,880
I think I've exhausted all my
questions.
1047
00:54:24,400 --> 00:54:25,920
Oh yeah, I didn't have any at
the start.
1048
00:54:25,920 --> 00:54:28,240
So bloody JD was the man behind
this fight.
1049
00:54:28,240 --> 00:54:31,000
So now we are mate.
We can't thank you enough for
1050
00:54:31,000 --> 00:54:35,840
taking the time to educate us
Australians on everything China
1051
00:54:35,840 --> 00:54:37,560
mate, that was absolutely
sensational.
1052
00:54:37,680 --> 00:54:39,320
It was fantastic.
I'd like to just.
1053
00:54:39,320 --> 00:54:41,680
Find experts, but I don't have
to read anything.
1054
00:54:44,280 --> 00:54:45,440
Well, thank you so much for
having me.
1055
00:54:45,440 --> 00:54:47,120
This is great, great
conversation.
1056
00:54:47,320 --> 00:54:51,280
Good stuff JD, bloody mate.
In the woods, China.
1057
00:54:51,600 --> 00:54:53,080
We're learning more every day
mate.
1058
00:54:53,160 --> 00:54:55,320
Joseph definitely got to listen
back to that.
1059
00:54:55,800 --> 00:54:59,600
I did try and ask a nuclear
question, but it wasn't in the
1060
00:54:59,600 --> 00:55:01,160
wheelhouse.
I'm like, Oh well, I'll just go
1061
00:55:01,160 --> 00:55:03,800
get a coffee or something.
Not following Rolodex nuclear
1062
00:55:03,800 --> 00:55:04,360
question.
Nuclear.
1063
00:55:05,480 --> 00:55:08,160
Question, how can I bring this
conversation back to something
1064
00:55:08,160 --> 00:55:09,000
island?
I know.
1065
00:55:09,600 --> 00:55:11,160
Yeah, it's not good on your
comma.
1066
00:55:11,160 --> 00:55:14,200
Appreciate that mate.
China, who else is like, are you
1067
00:55:14,200 --> 00:55:17,520
going to give a good on you too?
Well, top of my list would be
1068
00:55:17,520 --> 00:55:19,560
MMS Maddie.
Top of the list every time.
1069
00:55:19,560 --> 00:55:22,480
And it's it's a sort of equal
top also with grounded cross
1070
00:55:22,480 --> 00:55:23,960
boundary energy.
The list goes on.
1071
00:55:23,960 --> 00:55:27,000
Actually, ground support,
they're right up there, mate.
1072
00:55:27,000 --> 00:55:29,760
CRE insurance.
Yeah, Greenland's equipment also
1073
00:55:29,760 --> 00:55:33,560
equal first K Drew MMTS.
Oh mate, Reese with told me the
1074
00:55:33,560 --> 00:55:35,000
Australian earthworks and
Pulwich.
1075
00:55:35,760 --> 00:55:37,640
And last but not least, Spark
Mate.
1076
00:55:38,080 --> 00:55:40,320
Oh, use it right, Odoru.
Money miners.
1077
00:55:40,440 --> 00:55:45,480
Odoru Information contained in
this episode of Money of Mine is
1078
00:55:45,480 --> 00:55:47,680
of general nature only and does
not take into account the
1079
00:55:47,680 --> 00:55:51,280
objectives, financial situation,
or needs of any particular
1080
00:55:51,280 --> 00:55:53,320
person.
Before making any investment
1081
00:55:53,320 --> 00:55:56,360
decision, you should consult
with your financial advisor and
1082
00:55:56,360 --> 00:55:59,520
consider how appropriate the
advice is to your objectives,
1083
00:55:59,720 --> 00:56:01,720
financial situation and needs.